<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Random Hacks: Comments on "Putting open source on trial"</title>
    <link>http://www.randomhacks.net/articles/2003/06/27/putting-oss-on-trial-comments</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>Technology and Other Fun Stuff</description>
    <item>
      <title>Comments on &amp;quot;Putting open source on trial&amp;quot;</title>
      <description>    &lt;p&gt;Charles Cooper &lt;a href='http://rss.com.com/2010-1071_3-1021630.html?type=pt&amp;amp;part=rss&amp;amp;tag=feed&amp;amp;subj=news'&gt;writes&lt;/a&gt;:
    "After examining earlier this month what SCO claims is offending code,
    however, I think the open-source community better prepare itself to
    face tough criticism of its practices and ethics."  Charles Cooper
    bases this charge on Linus' unwillingness to read other people's
    patents, and suggests that Linus also ignores other people's
    copyrights.  Unfortunately, this generalization badly weakens an
    otherwise interesting article.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.randomhacks.net/articles/2003/06/27/putting-oss-on-trial-comments"&gt;Read More&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:f35b6d10-db6a-4296-a303-aebc5a2a2cab</guid>
      <author>Eric</author>
      <link>http://www.randomhacks.net/articles/2003/06/27/putting-oss-on-trial-comments</link>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.randomhacks.net/articles/trackback/65</trackback:ping>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
