<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Random Hacks: Lightweight Languages 2 Conference</title>
    <link>http://www.randomhacks.net/articles/2002/11/10/ll2</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>Technology and Other Fun Stuff</description>
    <item>
      <title>"Lightweight Languages 2 Conference" by Doug Auclair</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I had the pleasure of attending that conference &amp;#8230; sat next to Paul Graham, talked with Neel and Joe Armstrong &amp;#8230; and have been looking for that ever since.  Did attend the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;PADL2006&lt;/span&gt;, which was very good, and the FLoC2007, which, in my opinion was too focused on esotera.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;What did come out of the FLoC for me was the importance of dependent types and the application of coinduction to logic programming (particularly Prolog).  Unfortunately, the coinduction guys were slammed in the conference (With &amp;#8220;look how smart I am and you are not&amp;#8221; comments such as &amp;#8220;That number is not omega, it&amp;#8217;s alpha&amp;#8221;) and weren&amp;#8217;t ready to move coinduction beyond the research phase.  From the dependent types people, including the very friendly and helpful Dr. Andrew Appel, I continually got the comment &amp;#8220;why would you ever use dependent types in industry?&amp;#8221;  This comment stunned me because each synopsis in the dependent type papers I&amp;#8217;ve read start out: &amp;#8220;dependent types help you program more safely and better&amp;#8221;.  My counter question is &amp;#8220;why &lt;span class="caps"&gt;WOULDN&lt;/span&gt;&amp;#8217;T one use dependent types in industry?&amp;#8221;&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;So if there was a dream-come-true conference like &lt;span class="caps"&gt;LL2&lt;/span&gt; was, it would include concise logical/declarative programming with coinduction and dependent types.  Oh, &lt;span class="caps"&gt;STM&lt;/span&gt; for composable concurrency for a bit of variety.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Anyone wish to host this?  I&amp;#8217;ll register early.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 10:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:b0d2b1ef-2e09-4036-a4d4-59c7178be36f</guid>
      <link>http://www.randomhacks.net/articles/2002/11/10/ll2#comment-534</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Lightweight Languages 2 Conference" by Atropisol</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;If I recall correctly, the Rotor developers were pretty focused on FreeBSD at the time, and I’m not sure that Rotor had actually been ported to Linux.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;You’re right about the licensing terms: Everyone was a bit paranoid about looking at Rotor, for fear of getting “contaminated.”&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 07:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:cde9c70e-c61e-4d92-ab84-6a3503f29486</guid>
      <link>http://www.randomhacks.net/articles/2002/11/10/ll2#comment-520</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Lightweight Languages 2 Conference" by Matthew</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I am surprised not to see Lua mentioned here.  Maybe because that was in 2002.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 18:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:92347471-3d46-4c3a-ac07-654c81ceab78</guid>
      <link>http://www.randomhacks.net/articles/2002/11/10/ll2#comment-503</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Lightweight Languages 2 Conference" by Reg Braithwaite</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Four years later, isn&amp;#8217;t it amazing how much of this conference would turn out to be popular?&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;http://weblog.raganwald.com/2007/01/where-were-you-on-saturday-november-9.html&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 20:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:b8f6aa93-df23-4e31-a3b2-a681d35213bc</guid>
      <link>http://www.randomhacks.net/articles/2002/11/10/ll2#comment-232</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Lightweight Languages 2 Conference" by Eric</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;If I recall correctly, the Rotor developers were pretty focused on FreeBSD at the time, and I&amp;#8217;m not sure that Rotor had actually been ported to Linux.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;You&amp;#8217;re right about the licensing terms: Everyone was a bit paranoid about looking at Rotor, for fear of getting &amp;#8220;contaminated.&amp;#8221;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2005 10:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:53e2f03f-e1bb-4e2e-9a22-20732763421c</guid>
      <link>http://www.randomhacks.net/articles/2002/11/10/ll2#comment-102</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Lightweight Languages 2 Conference" by Kartik Vaddadi</title>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Rotor (Microsoft&amp;#8217;s FreeBSD implementation of the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;CLR&lt;/span&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;/blockquote&gt;




	&lt;p&gt;Don&amp;#8217;t you mean &amp;#8220;free implementation&amp;#8221;? (Perhaps pseudo-free would be a better description.)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2005 08:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:b45db516-9c19-4fd3-ac43-d5effd4708e1</guid>
      <link>http://www.randomhacks.net/articles/2002/11/10/ll2#comment-99</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lightweight Languages 2 Conference</title>
      <description>    &lt;p&gt;This Saturday, I attended the &lt;a href='http://ll2.ai.mit.edu/'&gt;LL2&lt;/a&gt; conference at MIT.  LL2 is
    dedicated to "lightweight" programming languages, a delibrately loose
    category including (1) any pleasant, easy-to-use scripting language and
    (2) any academic language which makes it easier to prototype and write
    software quickly.  LL2 is a small, informal workshop with audience
    participation.  The attendees are a diverse bunch, and enjoy goring
    each other's sacred cows.  You have been warned.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.randomhacks.net/articles/2002/11/10/ll2"&gt;Read More&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:1ba35c19-00f7-4d43-9ade-9b06e2adb4e1</guid>
      <author>Eric</author>
      <link>http://www.randomhacks.net/articles/2002/11/10/ll2</link>
      <category>Recommended</category>
      <category>Conference</category>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.randomhacks.net/articles/trackback/41</trackback:ping>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
