<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Random Hacks: Censorship of the Press</title>
    <link>http://www.randomhacks.net/articles/2002/09/27/aclu-on-patriot-act</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>Technology and Other Fun Stuff</description>
    <item>
      <title>Censorship of the Press</title>
      <description>    &lt;p&gt;The ACLU on &lt;a href='http://www.aclu.org/banned2002/'&gt;new censorship
    restrictions&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;i&gt;This part of the [Patriot] Act overrides existing
    state and federal privacy laws, allowing the FBI to investigate which
    books have been bought or borrowed by anyone it suspects of being a
    terrorist--an extremely broad and vague determination. Further, it
    prevents librarians and booksellers from revealing that such a search
    has taken place, and it &lt;b&gt;bars the press from reporting on such
    searches&lt;/b&gt;...&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

    &lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Thus the press and the public have no way of knowing when, where,
    or how often such searches have been conducted, or what books and
    readers are being investigated.  Normally, when a court imposes a gag
    rule on pretrial or trial participants, including the press, it may be
    fought and, in many cases, overturned. The Patriot Act makes such
    challenges impossible.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:20e041ac-0837-40b2-8d20-f5dbc55455d4</guid>
      <author>Eric</author>
      <link>http://www.randomhacks.net/articles/2002/09/27/aclu-on-patriot-act</link>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.randomhacks.net/articles/trackback/37</trackback:ping>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
